![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
The
Supreme Court of Canada decision
For equal marriage: The Attorney General of Canada's Memorandum of argument Metropolitan Community Church of Toronto Affidavit
of Rev. Dr. Brent Hawkes Affidavit
of Mary Bennett Affidavit
of Rev. Sara Boyles Affidavit
of Rev. Dr. Cheri DiNovo Affidavit
of Dr. Tim Ryan Affidavit
of Rev. Rick McCutcheon Affidavit of Marlene Jennings, M.P. Affidavit of Svend Robinson, M.P.
Against equal marriage: Notice of application to appeal and stay Interfaith Coalition leave to appeal The Association For Marriage and the Family Memorandum of argument The Interfaith Coalition on Marriage and Family Memorandum of argument
|
Legal Canada - Motion to quash marriage appeals succeeds October 9, 2003
Motion to quash marriage appeals succeeds Supreme Court of Canada sends meddlers packing They've
accused the Ontario Court of Appeal of bias (using
a report on this web site to bolster this bogus claim), attacked the Canadian
government for its compliance with These misguided meddlers and bigots, a gang of bullies consisting of religious and secular extremists, cooked up two attempts to appeal the historic June 10, 2021 Ontario Court of Appeal decision that changed the common law definition of marriage to include same-sex couples. The groups were not even a direct party in the lower courts, but they somehow hoped to increase their status at the Supreme Court of Canada where they served their foul brew of prejudicial poison on October 6. The court swallowed none of it, and today, just two days after the hearing, the Supreme Court of Canada announced that all five justices involved in the hearing agreed that there was no reason to grant an appeal or give the interveners in this case party status. The decision comes as no surprise to observers. During the hearing, it became apparent that the case had no merit. "This
is a decision by the attorney general to stop An
Order of Motion
was issued today by the The
court did not indicate whether the groups who Our
thanks to the Metropolitan Community Church of Toronto, the lawyers involved in
defending our rights, |
|
|
![]() |